{
In March last [4982% ] came home Braft
Persin Minute no. 4 which
is still under consideration in this Office.
In may last (despi-
8097/88
Answere]
by the present desp.) Lord Kuntsford wrote (par. 4) that Lord (uruarve
bevar not to be
promise of Jan. 1856
taken retrospectivel
so that taking
88 togethe
the S. fstates desp. of Ort. 86 + May 28 the promise of Lord Carnarvon is only traffeleg to half pay leave taken between 1876 t
1886
But Mr. Revend
think that we are more or
Lord Carnarvon's more,
now seems t
less bound by favourable
interpretation of the promise in das when desp. on 5855%, he approved a draft
in 5855/76
Rule which did not make the newsule
nom. retrospective.
A
I think we are not.
bound by any alone has in any bound by anything begund the original
which
promise whe
been really published.
As to what the practice has been, judging
Passen
from Marshi's & Wharry's Prusin par (in 6604 & 1520/55) it
top
rule simply to allow all leave bu full, an
Comment in
fiver of
200
became
particulars
are
the total leave taken includty so that neither the leave)-
pincation leave
sextinctions of
Lord Carmarion's original nor that of the Draft 1896 Menite appear to be applied.
desp
In Thomsett's case we raised the fount with the result at present / cutting doin his persin, & if we adhere to the decision that they promise in 1876arly applies to the period
*
обру
& which in
mare severe
than Col.
Reff: 102
as it now. Stand
I think
altezethan. We
MINUTE PAPER.
addition
between 1876 & 1886, there will be no change=
of pension due to Thumsett.
If again we
apply the last clause Monier 11876
of Lord Carnarvons test thietty
well
as the first clause, it will seriously affect Six S. Phillippo's pensin
جرن
of his last leave ca
ver
likes
ar
nt at all
affect M. Prices
& it will similar affect
pensim ultimately, if an has been suggested
be
comes lens an
leave,
with a view t
When
recovering his health, bort after getting
some extensions
a
the ground of
health
little
ultimated retires in this country. On the whole I think that verz injustice would be caused by denouncing
mit it to this altogether Lord Carnarvon's promise (subject
1876-1886
Ricett
has the most
Mpett
as it was to the inclusion
which alone in
of vacation leave
Hugking may amount to one sixth of resident service) so far as
Existing
teine
member of the service are Concerned - observing at same that it is of con
Course for late to revise
Insions alreadz granted but it does not appear clear that within it was ever properly (in all its entires) afflied been applied to Pensions recently granted. If however it is decided to adhere in it remains some degree to the prom rendent
service
words include period of vacation leave or not.
t¿
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.